Hi Martin,
I had to rebase your principle-specialization patch because the
indentation was wrong in the file.
Please check it and make sure that I didn't mess it up too much, but we
changed
the spacing in other symmetric function files and this caused an error on
some people using the queue.
-Mike
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 14:46:39 UTC-5, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:32:34AM -0700, Hugh Thomas wrote:
> > (My "help" probably only made the process longer, but I did learn
> > something.)
>
> Which is the point: I want to train others to do my job :-)
>
> > I edited your explanation in the series file because I think it
> > had typos, including some which were potentially confusing.
> > Please check that what is now there makes sense (when you have a
> > minute).
>
> That's correct, thanks!
>
> > Could you please explain what you did so that now my sage-5.0
> > sage -combinat update knows to select the 5_1_rc1 guard when
> > before, it didn't?
>
> The guard was 'sage_5_1_rc1' instead of '5_1_rc1'.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
> --
> Nicolas M. Thi�ry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/MWnWKoTautEJ.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
