On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:21:31 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote: > > On 8/29/12 5:11 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:53:33 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote: > > > > In principle, reading the documentation of Partitions the command > > > > sage: RestrictedPartitions(5,[3,2,1], 3).list() > > [[3, 1, 1], [2, 2, 1]] > > > > should be achieved by > > > > sage: Partitions(5, parts_in = [3,2,1], max_length=3) > > Partitions of the integer 5 with parts in [1, 2, 3] > > > > but unfortunately max_length is not taken into account: > > > > sage: Partitions(5, parts_in = [3,2,1], max_length=3).list() > > [[3, 2], [3, 1, 1], [2, 2, 1], [2, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]] > > > > Is this a bug? > > > > > > The documentation for Partitions says > > > > Right now, the "parts_in", "starting", and "ending" keyword > > arguments are mutually exclusive, both of each other and of other > > keyword arguments. If you specify, say, "parts_in", all other > > keyword arguments will be ignored; "starting" and "ending" work > the > > same way. > > > > So it's not a bug: it's documented. (Not ideal behavior, I think, but at > least it's documented.) > > Then I think the functionality of RestrictedPartitions should be fully > implemented in Partitions > by allowing several keyword entries. >
That sounds fine to me. I think that RestrictedPartitions should not be removed until this happens. This could be addressed at #12278 or at #13072. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/jB_VJnwfYPIJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
