sage-combinat-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage 5.9.beta1 and the Combinat queue Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage 5.9.beta1 and the Combinat queue Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage 5.9.beta1 and the Combinat queue Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage 5.9.beta1 and the Combinat queue Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage 5.9.beta1 and the Combinat queue Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] Deprecation or simple removal of code ? Nathann Cohen
• [sage-combinat-devel] Review request: Implement multiplicative inverses of cycle index series (#14350) Andrew Gainer-Dewar
• [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Re: Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Jason B. Hill
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) tom d
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Martin
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: a problem in the new permutation groups code (and a solution ?) Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] About the Permutation class, and support for permutation over non-intergers Nathann Cohen
• [sage-combinat-devel] sage.math down? Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage.math down? Dan Drake
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.math down? Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.math down? Keshav Kini
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.math down? William Stein
• [sage-combinat-devel] Queue on 5.8 -- (mostly) good news Hugh Thomas
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Queue on 5.8 -- (mostly) good news Hugh Thomas
• [sage-combinat-devel] Reviewer for #12940? tom d
• [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken? tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken? Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken? tom d
• [sage-combinat-devel] Adding data in patch Christian Stump
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Adding data in patch Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Adding data in patch Christian Stump
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Adding data in patch leif
• [sage-combinat-devel] Sage-combinat Days in Paris Anne Schilling
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage-combinat Days in Paris tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Sage-combinat Days in Paris Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Daniel Orr
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Daniel Orr
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Mark Shimozono
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Type A nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials Daniel Orr
• [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Christian Stump
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Plotting a (multi-)graph Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Christian Stump
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Christian Stump
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Plotting a (multi-)graph Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] Implementing multiplication for maps Simon King
• [sage-combinat-devel] Morphisms and sage.cohomology Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Morphisms and sage.cohomology Simon King
• [sage-combinat-devel] The queue and sage.5.8.beta3 Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: The queue and sage.5.8.beta3 Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] partition code breaks k-Schur functions Anne Schilling
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: partition code breaks k-Schur functions Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: partition code breaks k-Schur functions Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: partition code breaks k-Schur functions Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: partition code breaks k-Schur functions Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: partition code breaks k-Schur functions Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] kschur versus new_kschur Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] kschur versus new_kschur Anne Schilling
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: kschur versus new_kschur Simon King
• [sage-combinat-devel] Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Kannappan Sampath
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision tom d
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Kannappan Sampath
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Christian Stump
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Kannappan Sampath
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Longest element in a Coxeter Group - name decision Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] __classcall_private__ in partitions Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: __classcall_private__ in partitions Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: __classcall_private__ in partitions Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: __classcall_private__ in partitions Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: __classcall_private__ in partitions Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: __classcall_private__ in partitions Simon King
• [sage-combinat-devel] A one-day event to know more about the laws of free software in Paris ! (french) Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] A one-day event to know more about the laws of free software in Paris ! (french) Vincent Delecroix
• [sage-combinat-devel] Permutation constructor bug Christian Stump
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Permutation constructor bug Nathann Cohen
• [sage-combinat-devel] Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Cythoning sage.categories.homset? Simon King
• [sage-combinat-devel] _repr_ method for Posets Chris
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: _repr_ method for Posets Nathann Cohen
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: _repr_ method for Posets Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: _repr_ method for Posets Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] _repr_ method for Posets Franco Saliola
• [sage-combinat-devel] combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 Vincent Delecroix
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 Vincent Delecroix
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 (fixed) Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat installation fails on sage-5.7 (fixed) tom d
• [sage-combinat-devel] combinat.sagemath.org down? Anne Schilling
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org down? William Stein
• [sage-combinat-devel] Missing references in the docbuild Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Franco Saliola
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.7 Franco Saliola
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 (fixed) Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Franco Saliola
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.7 Vincent Delecroix
• [sage-combinat-devel] Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Simon King
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is there a reason for CombinatorialFreeModule to violate the unique parent condition? Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken on 5.6 Franco Saliola
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 (fixed) Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 (fixed) Franco Saliola
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 (fixed) Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 (fixed) Nicolas Borie
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: queue broken on 5.6 Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] Queue broken under 5.6 because of error in series file with #13862 Andrew Mathas
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Queue broken under 5.6 because of error in series file with #13862 Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Franco Saliola
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Nicolas M. Thiery
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Florent Hivert
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Florent Hivert
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Nathann Cohen
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Andrew Mathas
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat John H Palmieri
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Andrew Mathas
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: WARNING: Docbuilder patch (#6495) going into combinat Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] Polytopes Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Polytopes Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Polytopes Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Polytopes Volker Braun
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Polytopes Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Polytopes Nicolas M. Thiery
• [sage-combinat-devel] Review patch for #13605 + some minor rebases + indexed table patches Andrew Mathas
• [sage-combinat-devel] Help in unconfusing hg and myself Andrew Mathas
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Help in unconfusing hg and myself Nicolas M. Thiery
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Help in unconfusing hg and myself Travis Scrimshaw
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Help in unconfusing hg and myself Andrew Mathas
• [sage-combinat-devel] Crashes in docbuild Travis Scrimshaw
• [sage-combinat-devel] #14065 failed to apply on crystals.py Vincent Delecroix
  • [sage-combinat-devel] Re: #14065 failed to apply on crystals.py Vincent Delecroix
• [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Mike Zabrocki
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Christian Stump
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Mike Zabrocki
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Anne Schilling
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Mike Zabrocki
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-combinat-devel] how do you tell what branch you are in? Volker Braun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages