Ok, I just put my line in after all the other combinat stuff, and everything applies ok. This has the disadvantage of (further) breaking the seeming convention that the combinat bits be listed alphabetically. But if setup.py is headed for the graveyard in the long run, it may not matter much. Also, there's only about fifteen lines for the combinat portion, so the failed lexicographic ordering may be not a terrible problem.
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:11:32 AM UTC+3, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 08:59:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > > On 10/15/12 4:34 PM, tom d wrote: > > > I'm working on a patch which contains a modification to the setup.py > file, in order to indicate that a new directory exists in Sage. > > ... patch conflicts issues ... > > For information, I just asked on sage-devel if we could get rid of this > setup.py thingy: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sage-devel/tVTAQYFUgG0 > > Cheers, > Nicolas > -- > Nicolas M. Thi�ry "Isil" <nth...@users.sf.net <javascript:>> > http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/T0kH1hiSl34J. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
