On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:42:53AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> I definitely agree with you, and my guess from the inactivity on the
> ticket, they never got around to it. Personally I don't like SetPartition;
> it makes me think that should be an element of SetPartitions.
Well, maybe it should be?
> Would anyone
> oppose to changing DisjointSet to FindMergeSet or have any other ideas?
Vincent: let's discuss this face to face with the author next Thursday :-)
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
