On Mar 15, 11:53 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2:37 am, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 16, 2:23 am, "Nick Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is this because of precision issues? In that case, I still think this > > > should return [(1.0000..., 1), (1.0000...., 1)] and be documented as > > > such. > > > > sage: (CC(1)*(x-1)**2).roots() > > > [1.00000000000000, 1.00000000000000] > > > > sage: ((x-1)**2).roots() > > > [(1, 2)] > > > 2 here refers to multiplicity. The result of roots() are fine, it's > > the behavior accross fields that is inconsistent. > > In other words, I am agreeing with you :)
Do you agree that the current behaviour is brain-dead? 'cuz I'll patch it! Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
