> Hello, > > I have to agree with Martin on this. I see little advantage in > shipping a Qt application with Sage, especially since Qt4 static or > dynamic adds easily 10 mb compressed. I have also written similar code > (also qt 4.2.3 based) that has the added capability to wrap just > about any open source math system text interface and run an arbitrary > number of sessions in parallel. That code base is actively maintained > (fact is I get paid to do so) and will be release to the public under > the GPL in December or so. > > But: There isn't a reason to optionally have this interface, but the > default supported mode of Sage on Windows is the browser interface. > There are plenty of open tickets to improve that interface, and a > single 1.0.0 release 1.5 years ago doesn't exactly give a lot of > confidence. I would be glad if Ring would add a Sage mode and start to > improve the software, but that has to happen on his end unless > somebody here will step up and help out.
I also think only the notebook interface should be the default. Just one way of doing things and doing it well. Everything else optional. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
