On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:32:03AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 11:25:39 AM UTC-7 Thierry > (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:19:52AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > > Marc Culler's macOS binary packaging gets it right -- he just builds all > > > optional packages that happen to build without errors and includes them > > in > > > the binary package. It does not increase the overall size by much. > > > > Why not shipping binaries with and without optional packages on the > > mirrors for all distros ? > > > > Let's not go back to providing binaries. Nobody took care of them for > years: They were being built routinely as part of Volker's scripts, but > nobody bothered to check that they actually work.
I lost interest in building tons of binaries because there was an alternative, and i agree that anything we set up should be taken care of. If setting up a new build infrastructure solves an actual issue, then why not ? Ciao, Thierry > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4db74669-ad6e-4dc9-8049-bd9e7b2be893n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/20220426184653.GA31253%40metelu.net.
