Here a development infrastructure feature was designed and implemented by a 
new contributor. This rare engagement with the development infrastructure 
of the project is something that our community should welcome and encourage 


The feature was introduced through the normal process. At lease three 
people welcomed the new contributor. Claiming that there should have been a 
discussion in sage-devel before merging the PR is asking too much. There is 
no clearcut of what to discuss here or what not.

But now we are discussing about the feature, not about the PR of the new 
contributor. As we have some experiences with the feature, we can now 
discuss whether to keep it or not.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/432fd987-b828-4691-8c97-2284cf037b1an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to