I might take a look at this, as there are some ways fo computing B nos which are very much faster tha others, and not everyone knows them. Pari has something respectable, certainly.
John 2008/5/2 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It takes about 30 seconds on my machine to get the 10^5 Bernoulli > number. The mathematica blog says it took a "development" version of > mathematica 6 days to do the 10^7 calc. So it would probably take > some work, but we are not that badly off as is. > > -M. Hampton > > On May 2, 12:34 pm, Fredrik Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Oleksandr Pavlyk reports on the Wolfram Blog that he has computed the > > 10 millionth Bernoulli number using > Mathematica:http://blog.wolfram.com/2008/04/29/today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-recor... > > > > > > How does sage's Bernoulli number implementation compare? I'd like to > > see bernoulli(10^7) in sage beating Mathematica's time. And then > > computing the 20 millionth Bernoulli number... > > > > Fredrik > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
