> possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This > will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1. <snip> > around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition > will be painful otherwise please consider that into your plans.
I've been looking at the discussions about ReST and seen the Wiki page about it, but I'm not sure how that will actually impact Sage. In particular, if we are not including $$ stuff in a docstring, will anything change for how to write docstrings? Or will we not be writing docstrings in code itself at all? I looks like the markup will simply change, but I'm not sure. I'm sorry if this is described somewhere, but I couldn't figure out where that would be located. A sample of "before" and "after" docstrings would be very helpful, especially for those of us who have patches that need some work and won't be ready for 3.2.1 or for a while after that. Thanks, - kcrisman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
