On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote: > > > possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This > > will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1. > <snip> > > around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition > > will be painful otherwise please consider that into your plans. > > I've been looking at the discussions about ReST and seen the Wiki page > about it, but I'm not sure how that will actually impact Sage. In > particular, if we are not including $$ stuff in a docstring, will > anything change for how to write docstrings? Or will we not be > writing docstrings in code itself at all? I looks like the markup > will simply change, but I'm not sure. > > I'm sorry if this is described somewhere, but I couldn't figure out > where that would be located. A sample of "before" and "after" > docstrings would be very helpful, especially for those of us who have > patches that need some work and won't be ready for 3.2.1 or for a > while after that. > I have come late to the party. Is their any links to where I can find the new documentation standard?
thanks, Gabriel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
