On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Carl Witty <carl.wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:14 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I refereed #5318 which should definitely go in. It is a major > > performance mistake in the new multiedges digraph plotting code that > > came up during the status reports today. > > I'm guessing you mean #5327? Because #5318 has not been reviewed yet, > and probably doesn't need to go in 3.3 (although I certainly wouldn't > mind if it made it). You're right. I definitely meant #5327. Thanks for the clarification. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
