> > I'm not really familiar with Reduce, and am not a CAS developer. I am > a kind of "interested observer" and I try to be helpful by collecting > info about existing CAS systems and ideas and submitting links to the > experts - you guys. > > Since I am alot more familiar with physics/engineering/numerical > applications, I wonder if you think it would be a good idea to > maintain a version of Sage geared towards these types of applications, > especially now that Scilab and Reduce have been released as GPL- > compatible. > > Cheers, > > Hazem >
Thank you very much Hazem Honestly, I'm not aware of REDUCE capabilities, but I totally share Hazem's point of view. Just having a look at that article, I can see some interest for us to share (for example) the Z-transform features of REDUCE with any scientist/engineer out there. I'm not saying we should include REDUCE, also because I don't know whether maxima guys at least made z transform available, but I think we should at least consider taking some advantage from their open source code, especially if we are now working so hard in our own symbolic package. Could pynac take advantage of this? Regards Maurizio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
