On Mar 25, 10:05 am, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> More seriously, I think that for some people the distinction between Z
> and boldface Z might be hard to pick out (visually, that is).  \mathbb
> {Z} is unambiguous, has a nice chalkboard equivalent, and so on.  I
> know at least that trying to get anyone to tell the difference between
> v and bold v in any vector setting - whether in a book or on the
> chalkboard - is nightmarish, which is why putting those little arrows
> over vectors is so helpful.  Presumably the same people who need the
> large-print version of things would also find \mathbb helpful.
>
> So even though it looks nice in a book, there might be something to be
> said for standardizing a notation that allows one to separately talk
> about some other thing Z (for instance, a variable for a form) if that
> is helpful.  Not that that has anything to do with Sage.

Somewhat seriously, I have another argument against using blackboard
bold fonts: I can't get them to work with jsMath.  I think I have all
of the appropriate fonts installed, but when I try to view something
typeset in blackboard bold, I get the message "Unknown control
sequence '\msbm'."  Does anyone have any advice?

  John


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to