On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> This is the last in the series of symbolics related emails today. :)
>
> I'm looking for comments to trac #5607, which has this summary:
>
>
> In a comment to #5413 Jason pointed out the following confusing
> behavior:
>
> sage: g(x)=sin
> sage: g(3)
> sin(3)
> sage: g(x)=sin+x
> sage: g(3)
> sin + 3
>
> sage: g(x)=sin+cos; g(3)
> sin + cos
>
> I think the syntax for this should be:
>
> sage: g(x) = sin(x) + 3
> sage: g(3)
> sin(3) + 3
>
> sage: g(x) = sin(x) + cos(x)
> sage: g(3)
> sin(3) + cos(3)
No objection. However, I think
sage: t = var("t")
sage: g = function("g",t)
sage: g = sin + t
sage: g(3)
sin(3) + 3
is reasonable. Are you planning on changing this?
>
> Since it is not clear which variable to use if only sin is specified.
...
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Burcin
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
