Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Maurizio <maurizio.gran...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Kudos to SymPy! >>>> >>>> I'm wondering why the python integration algorithms implemented there >>>> aren't in the short term adopted by SAGE. >>> They are --- you can use them from sympy inside Sage. It's my goal >>> that all sympy features are nicely integrated in Sage. I work on this >>> as time permits. >> Also, in the pynac-based symbolics that Mike Hansen has been polishing >> up for full inclusion in Sage (to replace the maxima based symbolics), >> one can just do >> >> f.integrate(algorithm="sympy") >> >> and sage will compute the integral using sympy. He's already >> implemented this and I've seen it work well when I tried it out. > > Yes, that way Sage allows to call any of those libraries very easily > in Sage and at the same time uses just one library by default, that > currently is the best at integrating, I guess still Maxima.
unless maxima doesn't produce an answer (i.e., returns your expression unevaluated or throws an exception because of an assumption, etc.) Then it could automatically try sympy. -Jason -- Jason Grout --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
