On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Tim Lahey <tim.la...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> >> >> We use py.test/nosetest compatible tests, but if you prefer Sage like >> doctests, that's fine too. > > Good to know. I'm not actually using any unit test classes at the moment > since I have the difficulty that each test has different steps to properly > compare the output to the Schaum's result. The multiple solutions also > pose an additional difficulty.
I think sympy will do very poorly if the assumptions are needed, we are still working on the assumptions. So if it turns out too difficult, just skip sympy for the time being, we'll get back to it later. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
