> I too have founds bugs by reading code that I've written - usually, > very > early on in the development process. Note that I'm talking in the > context > of result verification, however. That is, when I publish a paper > that > depends on computations, it is incumbent upon me to verify those > computations. I'm saying that I don't think that reading source code > at that point is particularly necessary or useful. > > Mark
Really? I find that very surprising. While it was not the primary reason that I became interested in Sage, the ability to examine the source code for verification purposes was a major attraction. -Marshall --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
