As a comparison I just ran my old C program (implementing the
algorithm in my paper with Lagarias and Odlyzko) on my workstation
which is a fast Dell '86 box (sorry I don't have more details) running
Red Hat:

time ./findn 249999999999999
n=249_999_999_999_999
pi(249_999_999_999_999)=7_783_516_108_362

real    0m18.826s
user    0m18.628s
sys     0m0.028s


On May 5, 4:18 am, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 12:44 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net>
> wrote:
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > > We are talking about two different limits here.
>
> > No, we were not - just a confusing way I wrote it. A memory alloction
> > issue is completely different to limiting an algorithm due to concerns
> > about it.
>
> Well, I certainly am. To recap:
>
>  (a) prime_pi() used to use to be trivially implemented as len
> (prime_range())
>  (b) len(prime_range()) sucks memory and performance wise, i.e. eats
> in excess of 124GB for input n=2^35 and plainly segfaults for n=2^50.
>  (c) we have known failures of the new prime_pi() for some inputs,
> i.e. n=2^47
>
> So what I am doing is:
>
>  (a) cap the new prime_pi() to 2^40 since that is the upper bound we
> can verify via doctests in reasonable time. Given the wide testing I
> have done this seems to work.
>  (c) cap prime_range() to a reasonable value and/or rewrite it sanely
> - this has not happened yet.
>
> > As a matter of interested, what does Sage give for
> > primepi(249999999999999)? Is it the same as Mathematica (7783516108362)?
>
> Sage.math, i.e. 64 bit, gives me:
>
> sage: time prime_pi(249999999999999)
> CPU times: user 1241.60 s, sys: 1.07 s, total: 1242.67 s
> Wall time: 1243.69 s
> 7783516108362
>
> Since this is 20 minutes CPU time on a fast box we cannot make this a
> doctest, even a long one. I guess we need to implement a better
> algorithm :p
>
> > It would be interesting if it gave the same result as Mathematica on any
> > of the computers.
>
> > In[95]:= PrimePi[249999999999999]
> > Out[95]= 7783516108362
>
> > Dave
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to