Wonderful ! It was just a mistake coming from my own code ( please accept my apologies ! ). The coloring it now returns is : [[5, 1, 2], [7, 6, 3], [9, 0], [8, 4]]
Which is a partition into stable sets ( no repeated element, no missing one ).. and is of cardinal 4 ! ;-) Thank you for your help, my apologies for this fake warning... I will delete the related Trac ticket ! ;-) Nathann On Jul 30, 6:43 pm, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ooops, then it is another of my mistakes... I'm checking and I tell > you ;-) > > Thanks !!! > > On Jul 30, 6:38 pm, Robert Miller <rlmills...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Rob Beezer<goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote: > > > > As an aside, maybe the graph6 format doesn't work so well in Trac? The > > > back-ticks seem to have disappeared, leading to quite a different > > > graph. ;-) > > > Never trust graph6 string conversion -- almost every bad character is legal! > > > > Rob > > > -- > > Robert L. Millerhttp://www.rlmiller.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
