On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Jason Grout
<jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Jason Grout
>> <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> What about nintegrate/nintegral?  We don't have these now (as top-level
>>> functions), but they would mirror nicely the integral/integrate
>>> commands.  Should we only define one of them?
>>>
>>
>> Is integral_numerical a possibility (for those who like tab-completions)?
>> There are a lot of commands which don't play nice with tab-completion
>> (eg, matrix_plot) but it is nice if we could at least add this as an alias.
>> Also, a former colleague liked Maple's choice of designing the syntax
>> of integral
>> and that of plot (and the 3d versions) to be very similar. That way a
>> student could compute an area and plot the area with roughly the same
>> syntax. Does that seem reasonable?
>
>
> I used to be concerned about the naming conventions not playing nicely
> with tab completion.  However, previous conversations about this
> convinced me of this: rather than twist our naming conventions to be
> unnatural English, I'd rather make our tab-completion system smarter.
> For example, I'd rather have something like shift-tab give all
> completions that contain the word (as opposed to tab giving all
> completions starting with the word).  Would that satisfy you too?  Then


Sounds great! Would it be as fast as tab-completion?


> a student could just type:
>
> integral<shift-tab>
>
> and get a list of all accessible functions containing the word
> "integral", similar to what we'd get if we just typed:
>
> *integral*?
>
> at the command line.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Grout
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to