Perhaps someone who has a better legal understanding of the issue should write? If no one else will, then I will, but...
If you do, please make sure to cc sage-devel in, and ask that responses do the same. Maybe included a link to this thread, as well? On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:53 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Christopher Olah > <christopherolah...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So it sounds like nothing has changed for us? The conditions about New >>> York were what prevented GPL compliance before, I thought, and that >>> hasn't changed either. >>> >> >> It seems to me that it might be worth writing to them... I wonder if >> they know how problematic their terms are for integration in other >> projects? > > Go for it: http://www.graphviz.org/MailingList.php > > A quick search suggests this topic pops up every year or so on the list... > > GraphViz is evidently an AT&T project, and *all* the main developers > are AT&T employees: http://www.graphviz.org/Credits.php > > I suspect that AT&T really likes keeping control of the project, and > that we're lucky it is as free as it is (thank you AT&T). > > -- William > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- Christopher Olah Email: christopherolah...@gmail.com -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
