On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Christopher Olah wrote: >> So it sounds like nothing has changed for us? The conditions about >> New >> York were what prevented GPL compliance before, I thought, and that >> hasn't changed either. > > It seems to me that it might be worth writing to them... I wonder if > they know how problematic their terms are for integration in other > projects?
It would still probably be worth providing an interface, even if we
don't ship it, e.g. as an option to graph.plot(). We already have
sage: G = graphs.PetersenGraph()
sage: G.graphviz_string()
'graph {\n"0";"1";"2";"3";"4";"5";"6";"7";"8";"9";
\n
"0
"--"1
";"0
"--"4
";"0
"--"5
";"1
"--"2
";"1
"--"6
";"2
"--"3
";"2
"--"7
";"3
"--"8";"3"--"4";"4"--"9";"5"--"8";"5"--"7";"6"--"8";"6"--"9";"7"--"9";
\n}'
sage: os.system("echo '%s' | dot -Tpng > peterson.png" %
G.graphviz_string())
- Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
<<inline: peterson.png>>
