On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:59:41AM +0000, John Cremona wrote:
> To me "combinat" is short for "combinatorics", which is different from
> what I do (number theory, and more generally algebra). I certainly
> did not realise when the combinat people joined Sage how useful they
> and what they do would be for people like me! (This is supposed to be
> a compliment).
I appreciate the compliment :-)
> But I get the impression that quite a lot of discussion about design
> in this area is happening in sage-combinat, which it never occurred to
> me to join (since I don't do cominatorics). Would it be better to
> have another discussion group for (say) sage-algebra? Or is it
> impossible to separate what I think of as algebra with the rest of
> what goes in in sage-combinat?
You are perfectly right. It is some sort of deviance that, since we so
much need the category stuff for (algebraic) combinatorics, I tend to
discuss anything related on sage-combinat. The line is fine, but in
that case, I shall instead run the discussion on sage-devel, and just
crosspost a notice on sage-combinat.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
