On Mar 24, 9:07 pm, Rado <rki...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am thinking about throwing away "auto-maximize off" as it nothing > but headaches. Don't see any reason why anyone would want vertices off > the screen.
Yes, that'd be a quick fix. ;-) > So there is no escaping some "weirdness". I suspected as much. > If it was in Sage, one can call new "graph_editor()" in another cell > thats one less button to clutter up and forces the user to keep one > graph_editor per cell, which will save her/him headaches in the long > run. Ah yes, that makes good sense. > > Is the "spring-electric" layout coming from Sage itself? If not, it > > should be. It's great. See below. > Adding one function and the graph- > editor would be the planarity game (but in JS instead of closed-source > flash). Definitely. No Flash. ;-) > Once you apply the patch try G=graphs.GridGraph((10,10)); > graph_editor(G) in Sage. For some reason the standard embedding of > grid graph is not a grid, but with spring-electric it settles into a > grid. Its kinda cool. Yes, I bet. I'm impressed by the quality of the embeddings. My suggestion above was not to have Sage do the computations for the editor - the suggestion was to have the algorithm now in the editor duplicated as a standard layout algorithm for the graph theory code in Sage, it seems it would be a good option for creating "static" layouts. Thanks, Rob -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
