> That was exactly what I meant. In the case of the interface to tachyon, it > would > appear there is absolutely no testing of this whatsoever > > # interfaces/tachyon.py: 0% (0 of 4)
Though there is some testing of it in the plot files. The point is good, just not for that example. > In contrast, getting graphs/generic_graph.py up to 100%, by adding one test > when > there are already 200, would seem less useful to me. > > # graphs/generic_graph.py: 99% (200 of 201) > > So I would suggest that doctests are targeted, rather than randomly chosen. > (The > obvious way to get the coverage up quickly is to write simple tests.) But we do want doctests to test a fairly large number of the options, so just adding doctest coverage isn't enough. The doctests need to really test, as you say. Getting in more of the framework tests in (which I don't quite understand) will help, as would real randomization (which has been often discussed but perhaps is hard to implement?). Florent's point is also very good. There are a number of files which are no longer needed (e.g., axes.py) which are nearly undoctested. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
