On 09/14/10 04:18 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Otherwise, please move this thread to sage-flame - if only out of self-
interest. Potential developers will read this, and the tone (not
facts, which are not at issue) may help them decide to move on.
Thanks,
- kcrisman
To quote Nathann from him in an email sent to several of us who working on
getting Nathann's GLPK package into Sage:
=====================================================
though my way of seeing it would really be to avoid spending hours wondering
"how it could fail" when it seems so easy to just test it and write patches when
errors are reported.
=========================================================
That development attitude belongs on sage-devel, not sage-flame.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
