Seems fine to me. David On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:16, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In reviewing #8807 I spotted what looked like a typo: > "CompositConstructionFunctor". But in fact that is the way this class > name is defined. There are many occurrences of this, almost all in > categories/pushout.py, the rest in > rings/polynomial/infinite_polynomial_ring.py. > > Is there a good reason for misspelling "Composit"? Would anyone > object to a patch changing the class name to > "CompositeConstructionFunctor" ? > > John > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<sage-devel%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
