On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM, David Roe <r...@math.harvard.edu> wrote: > Seems fine to me.
See #10318 John > David > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:16, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In reviewing #8807 I spotted what looked like a typo: >> "CompositConstructionFunctor". But in fact that is the way this class >> name is defined. There are many occurrences of this, almost all in >> categories/pushout.py, the rest in >> rings/polynomial/infinite_polynomial_ring.py. >> >> Is there a good reason for misspelling "Composit"? Would anyone >> object to a patch changing the class name to >> "CompositeConstructionFunctor" ? >> >> John >> >> -- >> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to >> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel >> URL: http://www.sagemath.org > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
