That's a typo (almost certainly mine) and should be changed. Thanks. On Nov 24, 2010 3:17 AM, "John Cremona" <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
In reviewing #8807 I spotted what looked like a typo: "CompositConstructionFunctor". But in fact that is the way this class name is defined. There are many occurrences of this, almost all in categories/pushout.py, the rest in rings/polynomial/infinite_polynomial_ring.py. Is there a good reason for misspelling "Composit"? Would anyone object to a patch changing the class name to "CompositeConstructionFunctor" ? John -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<sage-devel%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
