On Dec 2, 11:36 am, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > >> Verifying correctness of tests is not a waste of time. > > > I don't know what the current coverage is, but lets say for argument > > it needs another 1000 tests to get 100% coverage. It's better to > > verify those 1000 tests now, rather than wait to we get 100% coverage, > > then go back and verify them. > > Orthogonal to your remark, but in sage-4.6: > > $ sage -coverageall > ... > Overall weighted coverage score: 84.3% > Total number of functions: 26592 > We need 173 more function to get to 85% coverage. > We need 1503 more function to get to 90% coverage. > We need 2833 more function to get to 95% coverage. > > It's only 2,833 tests! > That figure assume that there are no duplicate tests in sage. They are unfortunately a fact of life, like the two described here while testing sage-on-gentoo: https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/closed#issue/8
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
