On 2010-12-11 14:10, G Hahn wrote: > Thanks for the link and your help! If avoiding the preparser just > consists in putting a "%python" in the first line and starting the > timing from another cell, then I already did that. But still the > notebook is quite slow in my opinion. > Instead, I saved the code as a .py file and loaded it via "load > file.py" in the shell. This seems to work fine. But nevertheless my > original code was supposed to be in Cython (i.e. first line is > %cython) and was compiled by the notebook when pressing ALT+ENTER. Now > that I use the shell and a .py file, the first line "%cython" in front > of the actual code apparently doesn't work any more. Is it possible to > save the "_spyx.c" files generated by the notebook compiler and to > load them in the sage shell? > Thanks, > Georg >
The notebook should never be substantially slower. Either you're doing something different in the shell and in the notebook, or you found a genuine bug. If you want to load Cython code in the Sage shell, write your Cython code (without the %cython line) in a .spyx file and then load() that file. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
