On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:18:21PM -0700, Simon King wrote: > Hi Florent, > > On 26 Okt., 17:58, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@lri.fr> wrote: > > If you want some example of what has been painful in the past, here they > > are. Note: I don't intend any offense against the responsible of those > > changes, I'm just asking for coordination; Trivial change for you are not > > trivial at all for us: > > > > - Automatic replacement of > > EXAMPLES::$ > > sage: > > by > > EXAMPLES::$ > > $ > > sage: > > If I am not mistaken, the first version (without an empty or blank > line) results in a misformatted page in the reference manual. So, > those changes are neither trivial and nor just a matter of code style, > but they are bug fixes.
Sure ! I wasn't saying that we shouldn't have corrected those. I wasn't saying either that we shouldn't correct typos. I just said that I remember loosing quite a few hours ensuring by cutting a big patch boob chunk by chunk that the combinat queue remain applicable with or without this correction. Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
