Le Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:59:57 -0800 (PST), Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> a écrit : > still, might be worth trying (unlike with (e)glibc)....
Well, after some poking around, it seems it's a mistake to confuse eglibc and glibc, especially when considering upstream friendliness to suggestions/bug reports/patches ; here is a blog post about the debian developper which uploaded eglibc in debian : http://blog.aurel32.net/47 (now eglibc is the default libc in debian, and hence in ubuntu) So perhaps that isn't such a bad idea to try to fix the issue at its root : in eglibc! Snark -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
