I'd say the working definition of SAGE_FAT_BINARY is "made within the last 10 years".
In particular, it implies SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, which is the slowest "generic" target. You can build even slower ones on certain architectures. There is no way to build Sage on every x86 cpu, that would include 16-bit cpus without MMU... On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 8:11:31 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2013-12-24 09:01, Emil Widmann wrote: > > May I still ask what is "generic" and > > which processor will be the minimum on the x86 scale that will be > > supportet with SAGE_FAT_BINARIES? > It is SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes and it should in theory work with all x86 > processors, although it's hard to test whether that's actually true... > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
