Sage has definietly not failed! I use it as alternative to Matlab and Mathematica for years now, and what the true strength of Sage is not, that it is better than one of the 4M's, but is doing a equivalently good job in all those areas, which each of this programs is speciallized in!
The one thing I have personally to criticize about sage is that the scientific computing/numeric community is quite weak here. Of course thanks to scipy that part is very well covered, and the scipy ecosystem is part of sage, but it still has the feeling of 'beeing on board' instead of beeing fully integrated. On Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:17:43 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Surprisingly, sometimes Reddit contains actual discussions: > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/2e3qla/william_stein_says_sage_has_overall_failed/ > > > -- H > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
