On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:13:25 AM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: > > I am again very interested in having Windows 64 ports of various packages. > > At the top of my list are: > > * GAP > * Singular > * Pari/GP > > Note that MinGW2 is a much better way to do this than has previously been > available. It builds packages in a tiny fraction of the time it takes to > build with MinGW. It also fixes the broken parallel make that was in MinGW. > It has a nice package manager. The compiler seems stable. It 1000% better > in every way. In my opinion, a more or less native port of various packages > to MinGW2 is quite feasible. > > Note that cross-compiler running on linux and targetting mingw(64) have been available since mingw(64) is. You even get Debian packages for them. And they are fast.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
