On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:09:53PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> I agree with Dima in that it would be great to have some of the basic
> ring theory available in improved. There are some basic deficiencies
> with (Laurent) polynomial rings, especially in more than one variable
> and it would great if all of the problems with quite basic rings could
> be ironed out. In addition, my life would be much easier if sage were
> able to efficiently compute in the location of a ring at a ideal --
> what I would really like is to be able to calculate in modular systems
> "with parameters", which is my way of saying that I would like to be
> able to explicit calculations in modular systems for Iwahori-Hecke
> algebras. Implementing all of these gadgets is, perhaps, not so
> exciting from the point of view of a grant application, but not having
> these basic ring constructions available limits what you can currently
> do with sage.
+1. The big question here is whether we have someone with both the
expertise and time to implement those features, and whether the grant
could help provide us such a person ...
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
