On 11/11/2014 4:46 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
* The sentence "A recent tweak of another part of Sage’s matrix code had changed the definition of “small n” to n <= 63." is wrong: what had changed is the bound on p to compute the determinant over GF(p) using LinBox (for larger p, we compute determinants over GF(p) by lifting to ZZ): it used to be the case that the bound in LinBox depended on n, this was changed to a fixed bound for p which was less than the old value for n <= 63.
What's the fixed bound? UAW -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
