On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Bill Page <bill.p...@newsynthesis.org> wrote:
>
> On 2014-11-19 9:36 AM, "Bill Page" <bill.p...@newsynthesis.org> wrote:
>> ...
>> Then I noticed that if we have f=z we get
>>
>>   conjugate(z).diff(z)
>>
>> which is 0.  So the 2nd term is 0 and the result is just the first
>> Wirtinger derivative.
>>
>> Perhaps I am misinterpreting something?
>>
>
> Oops, my fault.  According to your definition
>
>   conjugate(z).diff(z) = 1

Right, because this "diff" is the total derivative in the direction
theta, so the first Wirtinger derivative is 0, the second one is 1 and
you get:

0 + 1*e^{-2*i*theta})

and if you implicitly set theta=0, then you get 1.

Ondrej

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to