For binary trees, I have made http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18698 that needs review.
Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:19:22 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > Indeed, the failure for binary trees should come from canonical labeling. > It would be enough to > change the doctest so that they are no longer sensitive to that. > > I am no longer that sure that TOPCOM is the other problem. What other > package is delaing with homology ? chomp ? > > Frederic > > Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:09:23 UTC+2, Nathann Cohen a écrit : >> >> > I would suspect that topcom should be responsible for the homology >> errors. >> > >> > No idea for what happens to binary trees. They seem to be reversed >> (left-right symmetry ?) >> >> That could be 'bliss'. It becomes the default algorithm to compute >> automorphism groups of graphs and canonical representatives. Those >> canonical representatives will be different from the previous ones, >> though. >> >> Nathann >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
