On 2015-09-09 17:06, John H Palmieri wrote:
I think that we should white-list at least some of these, and also try
to convert some of them (all of them?) to new-style packages. Same with
Simon's p_group_cohomology package, which didn't build correctly for me.
I don't have objections to leaving things as they are (i.e., completely
opaque, maybe also stop them from being listed in "sage --optional") for
the broken old-style spkgs (many of the others, although I didn't test
all of the ones that were last modified more than 5 years ago).
OK, I am adding this as a variation on (D):
(D''): sage -i OLDSTYLEPKGNAME should give an error, except if
OLDSTYLEPKGNAME is in a pre-determined white-list of packages.
But the hard question remains: which packages should be white-listed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
