Hello everybody, >From time to time, I get these emails asking whether this or that feature of our graph theory library if available independently from Sage.
I often answer 'no' or 'it isn't had to strip the python file of its Sage attributes'. Sometimes it is Cython code, and it then becomes hard to make it independent easily. I am thinking of rewriting some code in C++, so that people can use the source even without Sage. What do you think ? We do not have anything 'between' Sage code and an external library. In this case, I wouldn't want to package those sources as an optional/standard package, but to keep them as native code, in C++. It would be 'Sage source code', though made to be used independently. What do you think of that ? Just wondering. Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuun, Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
