> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it then seems to me that you generally > agree that it makes sense to accept a module into Sage which is somehow > marked as (temporarily) unstable?
> Yes, it does address a very real issue. However I differ now in my opinion about how best to implement this... > > My disagreement with Travis seems to > stem from our different views on this. > > Best, > Johan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > <javascript:;>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
