Le mardi 1 novembre 2016 15:03:19 UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : > > > > Fri 2016-10-28 17:03:26 UTC+2, William: > > >> - Python stats have come a *LONG* way in the last 10 years, with >> libraries like Pandas. Why use rpy2 when you can much more >> effectively use pandas and statsmodels and so on. >> >> In my opinion, it would be way, way better to completely remove R from >> Sage and instead do the following: >> >> 1. Include the R jupyter kernel config files. >> >> 2. Includes the modern Python stats libraries pandas and >> statsmodels in Sage. >> >> Our time would be much better spent supporting 2 than 1. It's >> ridiculous that we spend no effort on pandas/statsmodels, and all this >> effort on R. That was a strategy that made sense 10 years ago, but >> not today. >> >> For example, I recall that there are some issues involving pandas + >> statsmodels + the sage preparser. We could put effort into >> addressing those, like Robert Bradshaw did with numpy (which used to >> be very unhappy with Sage integers, reals, etc.). Fixing this stuff >> probably wouldn't be hard, and would make Sage a better environment >> for stats. There may be similar remarks around machine learning, >> where Python has really come into its own recently (e.g., see >> tensorflow). >> > > These issues with Sage integers were recently illustrated > by this Ask Sage question: > > > https://ask.sagemath.org/question/35270/sage-vs-python-integers-and-floats-in-pandas-matplotlib-etc/ > > If anyone knows how to fix that, it would be very appreciated. >
Auto-casting ? That should be solved on Panda's side... -- Emmanuel Charpentietr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
