Despite my attempt to bring the discussion into the realm of objectivity, 
it is apparent that personal preference has won.

>>>On Friday, December 1, 2017 at 7:37:57 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I think it is much more important to fix bugs and to add new functionality 
> to Sage.
>

There is no reason that bug fixes and terminology fixes cannot coexist. 
>From a technical writing standpoint, they are not mutually exclusive.

 

> >>>
> Regarding consistency:
> "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" -- Ralph Waldo 
> Emerson
> "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely 
> consistent people are the dead." – Huxley.
> 'Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative': O. Wilde
>

Creativity is a good thing, but SageMath is not a novel. In the technical 
world it is better if a rocket launch always results in the consistency of 
a successful landing.
 

>>>
> Regarding your first sentence: do you really think that clarity is somehow 
> sacrificed by using "maths" instead of "math"? I am very dubious.
>

I was not claiming anything about sacrifice, just objective consistency.
If you begin fixing your car with a spanner, you end with a spanner, not a 
wrench.

 

> >>>
> Finally, there is virtue in recognizing that Sage is supported by a 
> world-wide network of contributors, and people speak different languages 
> around the world (BTW: we welcome translations of Sage documentation to 
> more languages!). Even among those of us that speak English, there are 
> variations in how we speak it. Recognizing and supporting this is valuable, 
> just as is encouraging all other types of diversity in Sage, in 
> mathematics, in life.
>

Excellent :)

 

>
>
> On Friday, December 1, 2017 at 4:46:35 PM UTC-8, DC wrote:
>>
>> For the sake of clarity, definite points can be made to unequivocally 
>> illustrate the need to take the very simple step and *be* *consistent*, 
>> by combing over this system and using the term "MATH" :
>>
>> Using the full word "mathematics" is a noble suggestion, and even 
>> acceptable to a point, however communicative human nature yearns for 
>> abbreviation (as seen clearly in many programming languages), so more than 
>> likely the proper abbreviation needs to be chosen. Objective consistency is 
>> the goal, not personal preference.
>>
>> Perhaps the absolute indication that the site needs to be revised to use 
>> the term "math" is the very premise and name of the product, SageMath. 
>> Either the term should remain consistent, or the name of the product must 
>> be changed to SageMaths.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to