I think we don't allow dashes in version numbers, only numbers and dots. It 
might be version 01-26 of eclib-2014 etc...

Just use eclib-20140126.tar.bz2






On Sunday, January 26, 2014 4:57:50 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Forgive me returning to this theme: 
>
> I have put a new file into ./upstream/ called eclib-2014-01-26.tar.bz2 
> and changed ./build/pkgs/eclib/package-version.txt so that it contains 
> 2014-01-26 
> but now running 
> ./sage -sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums 
> ignores eclib completely (and does not change 
> ./build/pkgs/eclib/checksums.ini . 
>
> What have I done wrong? 
>
> John 
>
> PS Is the sage-git list now deprecated? 
>
> On 23 December 2013 17:25, John Cremona <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > On 23 December 2013 17:02, Volker Braun <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> >> The tarball name for version 20030423.p1 would be 
> >> 
> >> database_stein_watkins-20030423.tar.bz2 
> >> 
> >> (without the p1) since it is supposed to be the upstream release. The 
> .p1 
> >> just means that *sage* patches it. The whole point of the new build 
> system 
> >> is that we do modify the upstream tarball to fix bugs, we keep our 
> patches 
> >> separate from it. 
> > 
> > Of course, thanks.  So obvious when you have it explained.  In fact 
> > the p1 signifies not that the spkg itself (which is just data) has 
> > been changed at all, only that this is a new version of the packaging. 
> > 
> > Just my luck that I have been learning these ropes with a couple of 
> > spkgs of which one is 2.7gb.... 
> > 
> > John 
> > 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Monday, December 23, 2013 3:39:52 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> [Re trac #15556] 
> >>> 
> >>> The command ./sage -sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums is ignoring two files I 
> >>> put in ./upstream/ called 
> >>> upstream/database_stein_watkins-20030423.p1.tar.bz2 
> >>> and 
> >>> upstream/database_stein_watkins_mini-20030423.p1.tar.bz2 
> >>> 
> >>> but I cannot see why.  When I had two similar files called 
> >>> upstream/database_stein_watkins-20131220.tar.bz2 
> >>> and 
> >>> upstream/database_stein_watkins_mini-20131220.tar.bz2 
> >>> it worked.  By "ignoring" I mean that a list of spkg names goes past 
> >>> but skips these two, and the relevant checksums.ini files are not 
> >>> changed.  I also tried deleting the old checksums.ini files manually 
> >>> first, but new ones are not created. 
> >>> 
> >>> I'm sure that this is something trivial, so please help! 
> >>> 
> >>> My branch is based off 6.1.beta0 (commit 
> >>> 3735dfdfbbf597e8aaa3376969f064fcd15eeb5f). 
> >>> 
> >>> John 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> >> "sage-git" group. 
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-git" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to