On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:10:40 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > On 27 January 2014 20:55, Jean-Pierre Flori <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2014 6:12:38 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the quick reply! > >> > >> On 26 January 2014 17:02, Volker Braun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I think we don't allow dashes in version numbers, only numbers and > dots. > >> > It > >> > might be version 01-26 of eclib-2014 etc... > >> > > > > > Yes, it seems dashes break our scripts. > > We have the smae problem with singular whose upstream version numbering > is > > 3-1-6 rather than the usual 3.1.6 > > Luckily in this case I can easily change the convention for eclib's > version numbering! > > A more complicated version of our scripts should surely be able to > handle this given that we have a whole file dedicated to the text of > the package version? > > Sure. IIRC the regexp currently used to split out the package name from the package version looks for the last dash. Maybe the first dash followed by a number would be more sensible. But of course someone could always craft a package name which will defeat the regexp...
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-git" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
