On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:42, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > It seems that these machines don't have readline development files > >> > properly installed. > >> > > >> > Could you attach config.log ? > >> > > >> I mean the "main" config.log, not the ones from package builds. > > > > > > Here it is. I looks as if some version of readline was downloaded and > installed. > no, it says that Sage's readline will be built, because according to the > test, > there is no ncurses (or tinfo) installed. > > So I am puzzled that you say that the machine has libreadline-dev > installed. > Could you post the contents of this package? > $ apt show libreadline-dev Package: libreadline-dev Version: 6.3-8ubuntu2 Priority: optional Section: libdevel Source: readline6 Origin: Ubuntu Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> Original-Maintainer: Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug Installed-Size: 6,144 B Depends: libreadline6-dev (= 6.3-8ubuntu2) Conflicts: libreadline-gplv2-dev Supported: 9m Download-Size: 992 B APT-Manual-Installed: yes APT-Sources: http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages Description: GNU readline and history libraries, development files The GNU readline library aids in the consistency of user interface across discrete programs that need to provide a command line interface. . The GNU history library provides a consistent user interface for recalling lines of previously typed input. . This package is a dependency package depending on libreadline6-dev. > As well, I'd like to look at the output of > > $ ldd `find /usr -name libreadline.so` > > - which should look more or less like: > > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc2a2ce000) > libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 (0x000079942a162000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000799429fa1000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000079942a3f3000) > It finds the system one as well as two sage installation ones. The system one is like what you expected: /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libreadline.so: linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffd459fe000) libtinfo.so.6 => /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007f9940e43000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f9940a73000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f99412d3000) /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so: linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe9e4ce000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f00db8e3000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f00dbf03000) /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so: linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffebbdd6000) libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f2e72d1b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f2e7294b000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2e73193000) > > I gather that the test we have for system's ncurses is too > restrictive, and doesn't work > even though it should... (So this is a potential Sage bug) > > To continue with this problem: > Indeed, readline gets built by Sage, but it's a bit broken, as I > gather it's not linked > against libtinfo: > > To check this, please post the output of > > $ ldd /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so.6 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffce3bbe000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fbee541b000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fbee5a3b000) > > I don't know why this doesn't work, it might be something went wrong in > ------------------ > commit 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf > Author: Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed May 1 10:58:00 2019 +0100 > > get termcap library name from the readline's configure > -------------------- > > (so this might be another Sage bug) > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Fixing at least one of these bugs might cure the systems you have, but > more info is needed... > What OS is that, precisely? > $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial (Same for all 6 machines. I have tried to be consistent by reporting answers to your questions all from the same one.) > > Sorry for trouble, > Not at all, thanks for your help. On a more positive note, my python3 build on one of these machines was fine after git pull trac develop. > Dima > > > And Python2 does not do a very good job gathering what extra libs are > needed, > as its confugure output says > > checking how to link readline libs... -lreadline -ltermcap > > but then the error happens in the linking where one does not see > -ltermcap, but > rather -lcursesw > > (so this might be a Python2 bug) > > > > > > > I can of course install more ubuntu packages on these machines (though I > do have libreadline-dev installed already) but that's not quite the point > here. > > > > John > > > >> > >> > > >> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build 8.9 I > downloaded the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases section on github. After > unpacking and "make configure" I then did "make". On 6 different machines, > all running ubuntu, all the builds failed with > >> > > > >> > > Error building Sage. > >> > > > >> > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily > >> > > during this run of 'make all-start'): > >> > > > >> > > * package: python2-2.7.15.p1 > >> > > log file: /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/logs/pkgs/python2-2.7.15.p1.log > >> > > build directory: > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python2-2.7.15.p1 > >> > > > >> > > One logfile is attached, they all fail the same easy: something > about readline. > >> > > > >> > > The point here is not so much what I should do to get around this, > but rather, what is wrong with "make configure; make" which led it to > happen on machines where the prerequisites for Sage are certainly all > installed since they all have working versions of 8.8 (and many previous, > and in some cases 8.9 prereleases) built from the github repo. > >> > > > >> > > John > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:07, Samuel Lelièvre < > samuel.lelie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> ## Debian > >> > >> > >> > >> On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from > >> > >> SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, > >> > >> both py2 and py3. In both cases: > >> > >> - `make`: ok > >> > >> - `make testlong`: all tests pass! > >> > >> > >> > >> ## Cygwin > >> > >> > >> > >> On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, > >> > >> with the following hardware and operating system: > >> > >> > >> > >> - laptop: HP ProBook 640 G1 > >> > >> - processor: Intel Core i7-4610M, 3.00 GHz > >> > >> - memory: 8 GB > >> > >> - Cygwin64 version: CYGWIN_NT-6.1 3.0.7 (0.338/5/3) > >> > >> - Windows: Windows 7 Professional (64-bit), Service Pack 1 > >> > >> > >> > >> ### Summary > >> > >> > >> > >> Here is a summary following this structure: > >> > >> - [file] # [failures or timeouts during make testlong] > >> > >> --> [result when tested individually]; [ticket references] > >> > >> > >> > >> - py2: > >> > >> - src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 doctests failed > >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > >> > >> - src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # Timed out after testing > finished > >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #27537 > >> > >> > >> > >> - py3 > >> > >> - src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out > >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #26119 > >> > >> - src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed > >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; see #28472 (positive > review) > >> > >> - src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 doctest > failed > >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > >> > >> - src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 > doctest failed > >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; this is #28334 > >> > >> - src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 doctest failed > >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually > >> > >> > >> > >> Read on for the details for each of py2 and py3. > >> > >> > >> > >> ### Python 2 > >> > >> > >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > >> > >> > >> > >> $ make testlong > >> > >> ... > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 > doctests failed > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # > >> > >> Timed out after testing finished > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-19-19-2f160fbc. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py > >> > >> [449 tests, 34.21 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> All tests passed! > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 81.7 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 5.5 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 34.2 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-21-35-400c0707. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > >> > >> [294 tests, 33.43 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> All tests passed! > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 34.0 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 5.2 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 33.4 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> ### Python 3 > >> > >> > >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > >> > >> > >> > >> $ make testlong > >> > >> ... > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # > Timed out > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > # 1 > >> > >> doctest failed > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 doctest > failed > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 > doctest > >> > >> failed > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 > doctest failed > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-10-19e3fc53. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > >> > >> [749 tests, 28.33 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> All tests passed! > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 29.2 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 25.8 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 28.3 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-59-bd646d17. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> File "src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py", line 597, in > >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > >> > >> Failed example: > >> > >> E.saturation([Q1,Q2]) > >> > >> Expected: > >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, 0.801588644684981) > >> > >> Got: > >> > >> Attempt to round -0.2617840677e25 to a long int fails, > aborting! > >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, 0.801588644684981) > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >> > >> 1 of 9 in > sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > >> > >> [192 tests, 1 failure, 5.96 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > # 1 > >> > >> doctest failed > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.5 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 5.7 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 6.0 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-01-55-2dd8733a. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > >> > >> [272 tests, 18.14 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> All tests passed! > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 18.7 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 18.0 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 18.1 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-03-34-441e450a. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx", > line > >> > >> 2055, in > sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > >> > >> Failed example: > >> > >> G = f.galois_group(); G > >> > >> Expected: > >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > >> > >> Got: > >> > >> Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate memory. > >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >> > >> 1 of 16 in > sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > >> > >> [397 tests, 1 failure, 5.79 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 > doctest > >> > >> failed > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.3 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 4.7 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 5.8 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-04-44-25198bd4. > >> > >> Git branch: develop > >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> File "src/sage_setup/clean.py", line 100, in > sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > >> > >> Failed example: > >> > >> for f in stale_iter: > >> > >> if f.endswith(skip_extensions): continue > >> > >> print('Found stale file: ' + f) > >> > >> Expected nothing > >> > >> Got: > >> > >> Found stale file: > sage/graphs/__pycache__/line_graph.cpython-37.pyc > >> > >> > ********************************************************************** > >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >> > >> 1 of 11 in sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > >> > >> [17 tests, 1 failure, 0.51 s] > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 > doctest failed > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds > >> > >> cpu time: 0.5 seconds > >> > >> cumulative wall time: 0.5 seconds > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF06vXMyROkEshs%3DYV1_500kbwPDhQGJBH39B14i8Ku3Qg%40mail.gmail.com > . > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7hW%3DTd2LqSa%2BybC-DrPgymFr8cvSHPRpEKnNwoMq%2Bpwg%40mail.gmail.com > . > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1x7jY7f%3DeJ2u%2BdYuTE27H_3P%2B_9jRZtBGu8%2BaJv%3DUYRA%40mail.gmail.com > . > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K6FUy-q%3DZurAgHbi3j6vvwQwqhXOiYYQhntXv92wkEgJA%40mail.gmail.com > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq2X7zP4AKCkKrRtJObAwHKPO_-CDhApX5j6vD4pmk-f8g%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K63ZXneidvbAbm%3DQG3Yu9xHfdPmm41nCXExnA2FTxZfdw%40mail.gmail.com.
